Photo of Katie Fraser

www.chuukaku.com

Katie Fraser's blog and website

I'm an academic librarian, working in the UK Higher Educational sector, supporting academics and students. Prior to this, I was a researcher, working with social and learning technologies.

My interests include the application of all kinds of technology, research support in libraries, learning spaces (my Librarianship dissertation studied an Information Commons project), evidence-based practice and the professional development of library and information workers.

You can find out more about more about me from the links to the left. Note that the views expressed on this website/blog are mine alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of any other individual or organisation.



Project Update

February 21st, 2013

About a month and a half into the new calendar year, and I’m definitely making better progress on my project work than during the autumn term.

The first big thing is that I’ve put together a proposal for a student Frontrunner to gather data on use of learning spaces around our campus. Frontrunners is a DMU employability initiative which recruits students to work on projects around the university (see the Frontrunners site). Fingers crossed that I’ll get the role approved: feedback on the application has been good so far. Either way, putting together the proposal has given me a much better overview of how the project will work, and putting together the role description and outline of skills which the student would learn was an interesting exercise, digging up some of my recruitment and selection skills from my old Occupational Psychology degree.

Our Library and Learning Services project on communication with PhD students is also moving along nicely: the focus groups are due to run over the next two weeks. I’m going to act as the notetaker for the first group, so I’ll get to see a colleague in the facilitator role. I’ve only ever acted as the facilitator before, so will be interesting to have a more detached perspective on the group. I’m sure I’ll be scribbling lots of notes! Next month we’re planning to go on some visits to other universities and see what we can learn from colleagues in the sector too.

This term has definitely seen me flip round from focusing on teaching, delivering a lot of sessions for the first time, to focusing on project work. However, the teaching hasn’t reduced much – I’ve just got a better portfolio of knowledge and resources to draw upon, and I’m delivering more familiar materials. It’s good to feel that everything’s starting to get a little bit easier, though!


Whatever happened to 2012?

January 3rd, 2013

Dear much-neglected blog readers

2012 was a bit of a whopper for me! I finally reached my goal of finding a permanent full-time professional post in February, and have spent the months since settling into my new role. Maybe ‘settling’ isn’t quite the word, mind. Quite a few changes in staffing across the year meant I took on additional subject support and activities I wasn’t expecting, and I’ve been kept quite thoroughly on my toes.

Each third of the academic library year has its own character: consolidation, development, and, finally, chaos. In February arrived to a flurry of meetings and orientation activities, and zoomed through what remained of the third that runs from January to April, pretty much skipping consolidation. Then I was up and running for development in the summer third, when academic libraries attempt a vast array of ambitious projects. To pick some significant examples, this year I developed eight subject resource portals from scratch, and helped overhaul the library induction trail, while learning about practice, pedagogy and publishing in umpteen new subject areas, and reworking my teaching approach to fit the new disciplines and systems of a new institution.

However, the first two thirds were (are always!) just an elaborate form of preparation for the autumn term, when chaos rules. This was a flurry of induction, teaching, meetings and, most critically, constant fire-fighting. I defy any subject librarian in a new post to remember this term as anything other than a blur, but overall I’m pretty proud of my work over the last few months, and feel like I’ve laid a good foundation for the academic year ahead. Writing this is the first time I’ve realised this, so yay!

Now here I am in 2013, back in the consolidation third, with an opportunity to actually do some consolidation this time round! There’s plenty more teaching and resource-wrangling to do this term, but I’m starting with greater knowledge of the university and its systems (and a bunch of familiar teaching materials to fall back on when needed).

There’s still a lot to do, however. I’ve got projects which need some attention: some research on learning spaces with an external partner, an internally funded project on our communication with PhD students alongside several colleagues, and my contribution to the development of our online postgraduate research training materials. My main aim for 2013 is to make sure I make the time for these developmental and evidence-based activities, now that I’m acting slightly less like a headless chicken.

I promise to write again, dear readers, when I’ve made good on at least part of that aim.


DREaM 3: Research Methods Workshop

April 27th, 2012

Edinburgh's Royal Mile

Edinburgh's Royal Mile

This was the final LIS DREaM (Developing Research Methods and Excellence) workshop, back at Craighouse Campus in Edinburgh. I’ve been using these blog posts as an opportunity to point towards resources on the talks from this event, and also reflect on how I can use these methods within my own work, and this post will do more of the same. Materials from this workshop are available online.

Horizon Scanning – Dr Harry Woodroof
Horizon scanning is the process of trying to spot incoming threats and opportunities for the future. Harry pointed us towards a couple robust techniques which he recommends for this. The first was DSTL‘s approach: scanning scientific websites and journals to identify future technology trends and using sentiment analysis to pick out innovations which experts had spoken about in glowing terms. The second was the Horizon Scanning Centre‘s approach: conducting a ‘scan of scans’, using the Sigma Scan database to identify existing horizon scans and provide a meta-review of their contents.

I think all of us could benefit from a little horizon scanning, and the resources and techniques Harry recommended could be applied on a smaller scale (e.g. using the Sigma Scan database to identify a few of the most relevant scans for a particular question and looking for common themes). As I’ve just become a subject librarian for Politics and Public Policy I’m also interested in tracking down the book he mentioned on experts and the limitations of their predictions in horizon scanning (set in the political sphere).

Repertory Grids – Dr Phil Turner
Phil introduced us to repertory grids as a way of recording personal understandings of a particular domain, and then talked us through the practicalities and some applied examples. The technique works by asking your interviewee to identify some examples of a particular category, asking them to comment on how two of these examples are similar to each other, but different from a third, and then seeing how all the examples score on these ‘constructs’. This gives a idea of core concepts associated with the category, and how the examples cluster together or are different from each others according to these constructs.

Phil’s example looked across several interviews to identify shared constructs, and then tested how further examples (in his case, treasured objects) were rated on these dimensions. I could see myself applying this approach in the work with learning spaces I’ve been discussing (across De Montfort and Northampton Universities) where we’re particularly keen to look at the meaning of spaces for students. One I’ll mull over and discuss with the rest of the research team…

Data Mining – Kevin Swingler
The final research method discussed was data mining. This term covers a whole stable of different methods used to create models from data, which can make predictions or be used to classify further data. Kevin talked us through the careful checks that need to be applied to data to ensure it is appropriate for the creation of such models, and potential pitfalls and ways of avoiding them.

The techniques covered weren’t a million miles away from the statistical methods I’ve used in Psychology (my original academic discipline) but slightly more focused on use of the model, rather than modelling the underlying processes. The talk inspired some spirited discussion of how much data we have sitting around in libraries that we never try and do anything with (for example, predicting demand based on existing usage figures). Maybe it’s something that could be explored more fully across multiple library services, using a similar approach to the Library Impact Data project.

Impact of Research on Practice – Professor Hazel Hall
Our last session of the day was facilitated by Hazel, and was designed to get us thinking about the links between research and practice in a more active way. We were split into 6 groups, 3 of researchers and 3 of practitioners (broadly specified). Each group focused on an aspect of the link between research and practice and what could be done to improve it. Then the groups were paired up (one researcher group with each practitioner group) and asked to come up with 3 ways of improving application of research to practice based on our shared discussions.

We had quite similar ideas across the groups, implying that we were all reasonably aware of and agreed upon the issues, and even potential solutions. Therefore, for me, the most interesting part of the discussion was about incentives: how do we ensure that researchers are incentivised to fully include practitioners in their research and dissemination strategies, and how do we incentivise practitioners to draw upon research in their practice? I think a big factor is the infrastructure in which both groups work, and it’s made me think about impact (particularly in professionally-focused research) from a whole new angle!

The next and last event in the DREaM series will be a conference. Unfortunately I’m not able to attend in person, but I’m looking forward to participating remotely: having seen the quality of information sharing at the previous DREaM events, I’m quite looking forward to that. It’s certainly been a fascinating set of events to participate in, although, as I said on the feedback forms, one where I think that appraising its true impact is going to require a long-term perspective.